Every JIT backend puts the host FPU into the mode fcr31 asks for (bits 0-1 and
24) before running emulated code, and takes it back out before calling any host
code. The plain interpreter did none of that, so all its float math rounded to
nearest with denormals intact no matter what the game had set - cpu/fpu/fpu
fails under -i and passes under the JIT on exactly this.
Move the helpers the IR interpreter already had for this out of IRInterpreter
and into MIPS.cpp as ApplyHostRoundingMode/RestoreHostRoundingMode, and use them
around the interpreter's run loop and single step, restoring around syscalls and
replacement functions, which are host code. ctc1 re-applies immediately, since
the interpreter has no block boundary to defer it to.
round.w.s changes with it: it was floorf(x + 0.5f), which is half-away-from-zero
rather than the half-to-even every JIT produces, and the add would now pick up
the guest's rounding mode on top of that. round_ieee_754 is both correct and
mode-independent, and is what cvt.w.s already used for the same rounding.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SfY7iFJEjmRXf1XGrTs4MF
step-over, step-out and run-until plant a one-shot breakpoint at the address
they want execution to return to. Keeping it in breakPoints_ alongside the
user's own meant the two kept colliding:
- Adding a log-only user breakpoint at the same address hijacked the temporary
one. AddBreakPoint() didn't match across temp-ness so both existed, and then
ChangeBreakPoint() looked up "the first enabled breakpoint at this address" -
a log-only breakpoint isn't enabled, so the temporary one won and had its
action overwritten to log-only. It lost PAUSE and the step never came back.
- RemoveBreakPoint() erased up to two entries per address to catch an
overlapping temporary one, so deleting either deleted both - including the
interpreter's cleanup path in CheckExecBreakpoints() taking the user's
breakpoint with it.
- ExecBreakPoint() handled one breakpoint per address, so with both at the same
address only one of them did anything: the step completed but the user's log
line never printed.
- Nothing dropped it when something *else* stopped us first, so an interrupted
step left a breakpoint armed at an address nobody was waiting for anymore,
which later fired as a phantom stop.
It's a single TempBreakPoint member now, invisible to the breakpoint lists and
untouched by user edits. One is enough: step over/out and cross-thread step into
all require the CPU to already be stepping and resume it immediately, so only
one can be in flight, and run-until now replaces rather than stacking (two
pending run-untils had no coherent meaning, and the loser stayed armed).
Behavior follows what other debuggers do. Both breakpoints at an address are
evaluated independently and their actions combine, so a log-only breakpoint
logs without stopping and still lets the step finish. Core_Break() drops the
temporary breakpoint on any stop, whatever the reason - the same way gdb deletes
its step-resume breakpoint and lldb discards the thread plan.
Two things to be careful of, both covered by the new TempBreakpoints test:
HasBreakPoints() has to account for it, or the interpreter's checked run loop
and the JIT skip breakpoint checking entirely and a step with no user
breakpoints set never returns; and IsAddressBreakPoint() (user-facing, for the
lists and disassembly markers) is now separate from NeedsBreakCheckAt() (what
the JIT frontends and interpreter ask), since only the latter should see it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GZq8ZtJmFY7bkX5FVkr3P9
Henrik RydgårdandClaude Opus 5
Herman Semenoff
Lin Runze
Mark Zhuang
oltolm
Nemoumbra